Valentine’s Day

February 21, 2011 11:17 pm

IMGP4219Valentine’s Day this year was fairly standard. I always find it humorous to see the guys dressed like thugs trying to act tough while they’re waiting in line with a bouquet of flowers and a box of chocolates at the grocery store.

Surprisingly, Livermore has more than 1 (and at least 3!) gourmet cupcake stores. I decided to give one of them a shot and ordered a half-dozen gourmet cupcakes for Jess. I brought them home at lunch, along with some flowers. There were 3 vanilla and 3 chocolate cupcakes. The chocolate ones had a cream filling. They were very tasty. Jess happened to like the vanilla more than chocolate and I liked the chocolate more than vanilla, so it worked out well.

IMGP4206For dinner we went to the Cheesecake Factory. We knew it was going to be busy, but it was busier than I expected. We got there around 6 and there was already a 2-hour wait. But, it’s located at the mall, so we just spent the time wandering around the mall. The food was good and we, of course, each ordered a slice of cheesecake to take home and eat once we weren’t completely full.

Victory for the Dickersons!

January 20, 2011 8:53 pm

As many of you probably recall, Jess and I drove to Texas in protest of the TSA grope-a-thon required to fly these days. Before the new, creepier security screening processes were put in place we had purchased airplane tickets with Southwest. When the change occurred I was particularly unhappy. I called Southwest and asked for a refund, which they refused to provide because “we don’t control the TSA; it’s not our fault.”

So I moved to plan B: I filed a charge dispute with my credit card company (CitiBank) and carefully detailed why I considered the scenario to be a breach of contract. They conditionally refunded the money and sent the dispute to Southwest which had 60 days to reply. The reply just came through and my refund has been made permanent! Hooray!

——————–

On a related note, an update about the letters we sent to the airlines and government officials. Every airline responded with a written answer. Most were along the lines of “it’s not our fault, we can’t do anything about it.” But the response from American Airlines was very simple and direct:

Thank you for taking the time to contact us about the recent changes that the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) has made to checkpoint security screening procedures. We are monitoring our customers’ feedback on this issue very closely, and we thank you for providing us with your impressions.

They’re the only airline that didn’t simply deflect the issue away from themselves. I appreciate that. The airlines claim they have no control over the matter and, ostensibly, they don’t. However, they do have rather influential lobbying efforts which could certainly be brought to bear on the situation. And that’s the goal I’m going for. If they get enough pressure and begin losing enough customers they will find a way to reign in the TSA.

Now for the responses I got back from the government officials. We wrote letters, (physical letters!), to our two Senators, our House Representative, the TSA, the FAA, and the President. We received exactly zero replies. In over two months not a single person, organization, or office responded to our concerns. No form letters, no acknowledgement of any kind. That really kind of bothers me.

The fact that no part of the government could be bothered to even acknowledge our concerns is why I have very little faith that anything will change until the airlines start lobbying for it. I’ve now learned very poignantly how little my opinion matters to the people who are elected to represent my interests.

Thanks America, you’re really doing a bang-up job with that democratic republic business.

—————-

So the scores are:
-1 to Southwest for denying me the refund when I asked for it on the phone.
+1 to Southwest for not denying the charge dispute when I filed it with my credit card company.
+1 to CitiBank for taking care of this for me (using a credit card does have some great benefits).
-100 to the TSA for implementing stupid “security” rules.
+2 to the Dickersons who successfully received a refund from a large company.
+5 to airlines for acknowledging my complaint.
-20 to government officials/organizations for not acknowledging my existence.

Christmas time is here

December 4, 2010 10:22 pm

Per Jess’ traditions we needed to decorate the tree today (today being the first Saturday in December). This, of course, necessitates having a tree to decorate. So we had to go and get a tree. Per Dickerson traditions this requires cutting our tree down ourselves after trudging around in the snow at least until you can’t feel your toes, preferably until someone is crying. Unfortunately, California weather doesn’t really cooperate with those requirements (though I suppose we could drive into the mountains far enough if necessary).

So instead we headed out to the Christmas tree farm that we went to last year in the 50 degree sunshine. We found a fairly decent looking tree and I cut it down. And yes, it’s on the side of a hill, which is why the fence is crooked.
IMG_0018
In no time at all we had Beatrice (last year’s tree was named Albert, this year’s is Beatrice) tied onto Chloe and ready to travel.
IMG_0025
The main difference from last year being that we actually went during the day and not as the sun was setting. Easier to work when you have light. We got the tree home and set it up. TADA!
IMGP3998
Check out that spotlight work on the angel.

Jess cheated and slipped some new ornaments into the ornament box as presents for me. Then tried to make me feel stupid for not recognizing them at all. But they are pretty neat. She used a Linux program which will convert a picture into a cross-stitch pattern for you. This one is my Mii from the Wii:
IMGP4020
And this is the Linux Penguin, named Tux:
IMGP4021

Since I had the camera out and on the tripod already (since I needed the tripod to get decent shots) I started playing with things. Here’s my abstract art of our tree:
IMGP4009
And this is what happens when you zoom in on the tree while the exposure is being taken:
IMGP4016

We spent some time watching the Livermore Christmas Parade (I suppose it’s probably called the “Holiday Parade” or “Winter Parade” or something, but it does end with Santa). And we watched The Muppet Christmas Carol while decorating.

Oh! And we hung up our stockings! Jess’ mom made her children stockings and last year made one for me too, so Jess and I have matching stockings. They’re quite lovely.
IMG_0026

Fly With Dignity

November 17, 2010 4:27 pm

A new grassroots campaign has started the website FlyWithDignity.org to continue to raise awareness on the issue of airport security.

They are collecting “signatures” in their online petition. Now, I’m not naive. I don’t expect the online petition to be used for anything particularly meaningful. However, they do verify email addresses and it at least represents a set of unique email addresses that have at least cared enough to voice their opinion on the matter. At a minimum it stands to contradict the news sources that claim very few people actually care about this problem.

In other news, the TSA head, John Pistole, was in front of a Senate Oversight committee today. From the Consumerist website:

He used the analogy that if passengers had the option of getting on two planes to the same destination — one which had been fully screened but which took a little longer and required scanners or pat-downs, and the other with no screening — “I think everyone will want to opt for the screening with the assurance that everything is safe and secure.”

I’d like to point out how he carefully constructs a false dichotomy and uses that to defend the invasive screening procedures. In reality our choices are not limited to invasive screening or no security. I’d be perfectly happy to invoke choice C, returning to the level of security we had 9 months ago. Total number of successful terrorist attacks involving planes from October 2001 to 2010 before the new procedures: 0.

The Letters

November 16, 2010 9:40 pm

Here are the letters I’ve written and will be mailing out tomorrow.

At the end of this post I’ve included the contact information for the major airlines in the United States as well as of the FAA and the TSA. I also recommend looking up the contact information for your Congressional Representatives. If you care about this matter please use those addresses and send your own letter.

This first letter is for the airlines:

To Whom it May Concern,
We regret to inform you that we will no longer be customers of your airline.
We think it is only fair to explain why this is the case, because it is not a reason for which your company is directly at fault. The reason we will no longer be customers of your airline is because of the actions of the Transportation Security Administration. We consider the advanced imaging technology equipment to be invasive and demeaning. When these devices were initially deployed we tolerated opting out of their use and being subjected to a cursory pat-down. However, the changes put in place by the TSA on October 28 (which require a more invasive pat-down procedure for those opting out of the advanced imaging technology) are unacceptable to us. Given that we no longer have a security screening option which we find tolerable we are forced to no longer fly until the security requirements change.
We’re not writing to argue about the efficacy of the equipment or any purported necessity of the screening. We are simply informing your company that we will not participate in these invasive and demeaning security checks.
We are not very frequent air travelers and we realize you probably won’t notice any change to your company’s profits because of our decision. Nevertheless, the airline industry in general will now receive a few thousand dollars less income next year than it did this year because of our decision.
The actions of the TSA are costing your corporation money and customers. We hope you and the other airlines appreciate this fact and do everything within your power to try to change the problem. We would be happy to return as customers if the security screening requirements returned to a level we consider tolerable. We are law-abiding citizens and refuse to be treated like imprisoned criminals just to travel within our own country.
Sincerely,
Kyle & Jessica Dickerson

This second one is for the FAA, TSA, and political representatives:

[Addressee],
We have decided that it is not worth sacrificing our personal privacy and Fourth Amendment rights to travel by plane. When the Transportation Security Administration originally began deploying the advanced imaging technology we chose to continue flying while opting out of the AIT devices. We considered the cursory pat-down to be a nuisance but tolerable for occasional travel. At that time we also decided we wouldn’t bother if we could drive to our destination within 12 hours.
The new changes put into effect on October 28, however, are unacceptable. We will not subject ourselves to an invasive and demeaning security procedure for the right to fly on a plane. As law-abiding citizens we refuse to be treated like imprisoned criminals.
We refuse to live in fear. We accept the risk that we are exposed to in a free society. We do not accept trading our freedom for an unmeasurable potential reduction in that risk. Until the security requirements are returned to a level we consider tolerable we will not fly.
We hope to see changes to the current policies. We plan to only vote for representatives who have shown a commitment to protecting our personal rights and our ability to travel within our country without abusive treatment.
Sincerely,
Kyle & Jessica Dickerson

Delta Air Lines, Inc.
P.O. Box 20706
Atlanta, Georgia 30320-6001

Southwest Airlines
P.O. Box 36647-1CR
Dallas, Texas 75235

United Airlines
Customer Relations
PO Box 66100
Chicago, IL 60666

American Airlines Customer Relations
P.O. Box 619612 MD 2400
DFW Airport, TX 75261-9612

US Airways
Attention: Customer Relations
4000 E. Sky Harbor Blvd.
Phoenix, AZ 85034

JetBlue Airways Corporation
Att’n: Customer Relations
P.O. Box 17435
Salt Lake City, UT 84117-0435

Federal Aviation Administration
800 Independence Avenue, SW
Washington, DC 20591

Transportation Security Administration
Office of Civil Rights and Liberties (TSA-6)
External Compliance Division
601 S. 12th Street
Arlington, VA 20598

The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 20500