CA Election 2010 – Propositions 20 & 27

October 27, 2010 9:44 am

Propositions 20 & 27 both address redistricting. 20 moves the congressional redistricting responsibility from the legislature to the Citizens Redistricting Commission (created in 2008 by prop 11 for state districts, as opposed to federal districts). 27 would instead repeal prop 11 and move redistricting responsibility back to the legislature entirely.

The CRC is made up of 14 registered voters who apply for a position on the commission. It convenes once every 10 years after each census to perform redistricting.

Only one of 20 and 27 will be implemented. If both pass, the one receiving more “yes” votes will be implemented.

To me it appears the CRC is designed to reduce the effect of gerrymandering by the elected officials. If the representatives aren’t involved in redistricting anymore then they can’t conveniently modify their district to make it easier to stay elected. The CRC has a strict set of criteria that must be followed when creating districts which are not required under current law when the legislature controls redistricting.

I’ll probably be voting in favor of 20 and against 27.

The CRC is supposed to try and maintain (as much as possible) neighborhoods and “communities of interest” which has been defined as “a contiguous population which shares common social and economic interests that should be included within a single district for purposes of its effective and fair representation.” The Pro-27 argument tries to say (without saying) that prop 20 is racist because of this clause. That by keeping a socio-economic population together in a district they’ll be disenfranchised (but they don’t really explain how). I’m not buying this argument since when kept as a district they’re basically guaranteed representation. The alternative allows such a population to be split apart into neighboring districts where they might end up being the minority in each of those districts. In which case they will definitely be disenfranchised.

I think of political districts like a machine learning clustering algorithm. You don’t want your clusters to have large chunks of unrelated data, especially when otherwise cohesive data gets split across several other clusters. That cohesive data should represent its own cluster. I think political districts should be treated similarly. Otherwise you get a definitely skewed representation rather than a possibly skewed representation.

In fact, there’s really no reason I can think of that redistricting couldn’t be performed by a fairly simple machine learning algorithm. It wouldn’t really be very difficult to feed in your parameters (the set of rules which the CRC must follow) and let the computer spit out your new districts. The code used could be published and anyone could potentially review the process and determine if there was any intentional bias introduced into the system.

CA Election 2010 – Proposition 19

October 26, 2010 2:58 pm

I’ve decided that writing short blog posts about the various propositions on this year’s ballot would be helpful in getting me to organize my thoughts and form an opinion on each topic.

This post’s topic is Proposition 19: The Regulate, Control and Tax Cannabis Act of 2010.

I’ve read the text of the law, the summary statement provided by the Attorney General, as well as the paid arguments for and against the proposition (all as provided by the official voter information guide). This is probably going to surprise some people, but I’m probably going to vote to pass this proposition. I’m not in favor of using marijuana, but I am in favor of treating it in a more rational manner than our country has been. From my understanding, medically speaking, marijuana is apparently safer than alcohol and tobacco, yet those substances are legal while users of marijuana face prison sentences (not that X is legal and Y isn’t as bad as X is necessarily a valid argument, but it holds a point).

The text of the law puts in place pretty much all of the same restrictions currently in place on alcohol and tobacco. I’m a huge fan of the public smoking ban and proposition 19 contains a similar restriction on marijuana use (can’t be used in public or in the presence of minors). I certainly wouldn’t be in favor of it without the many restrictions the law contains.

I think the legalization would provide an overall societal benefit in terms of reducing the number of incarcerated persons, increasing much needed tax revenue, and reducing cash flow to drug cartels. I think proposition 19 appears to be a fair compromise from the pro-legalization crowd while addressing the potential issues outright legalization might cause.

I’m open to hearing your opinions and taking those reasoned positions into consideration.

Camera Club Results

October 20, 2010 4:00 pm

I think we missed all the camera club meetings in September, but we made it yesterday. I submitted two images. This one placed 1st of 6 in Projected Pictorial – Basic:

Zoom Zoom
Zoom Zoom

(And yes, the car is on the wrong side of the road. I flipped the image because I felt it looked better with the car on the right than on the left. We’ll just pretend it’s in Japan.)

Oh, hello there

October 3, 2010 8:44 pm

I was taking some trash out and saw this guy sitting on the wall. So I tossed the trash, and zipped back inside to grab the camera.

IMGP3836a_small
There wasn’t a lot of light and I didn’t know how long it would stay put so I used a large smattering of settings hoping that one would come out well enough. That’s the best shot. Most of the others are too grainy from using too high of a sensitivity.

Anyone know what kind of bug that is? Mom, I’m looking your way.

Design: Good v. Bad

September 30, 2010 9:41 pm

I read The Design of Everyday Things awhile ago. Since then I’ve noticed basic design principles that are either good enough or bad enough to draw notice. Sometimes it’s only in contrast with a better (or worse) design that you realize how bad (or good) a design is.

I came across a particularly illustrative example of this while we were rearranging our books after having purchased another bookcase. Occasionally when you buy a set of books they’ll come in a thin cardboard box. This is the cardboard box that a set of J.R.R. Tolkien books was packaged in:
IMG_0011

Notice how it’s built like many simple boxes with a flap that tucks in. You don’t think anything of it until the moment you attempt to slide a book in on that side. The cover hits the flap and you risk damaging the cover if you try to force it.

This is the design of the box that all of the 3-packs of books from the Wheel of Time series came in:
IMG_0012
Specifically designed to have no flaps that might interfere with sliding a book back into place!

Since a lot of my work involves user interface design I try to pay attention to functional designs and pick out what is good or bad about them.

It turns out that it’s really hard to create good interfaces, which is why I try to appreciate them when I find them. It can be painful to watch users interact with some of the interfaces we put together at work. As a team we bend over backwards to make things as simple as possible—then you watch someone still completely fail to interact with the system successfully without coaching. It’s hard, but we’re really figuring things out and have been getting a lot of praise for our most recent designs.

If you’re in the application development world and you’ve never really watched an “average” person use a computer, you need to do it. You’ll have your mind blown by how kooky their actions are. It never occurred to me that some people will always drag-and-drop to copy/paste text. They do it because it’s faster than right-clicking and selecting copy and then right-clicking and selecting paste. But they’ve never learned that ctrl-c / ctrl-v is far more convenient. We made some people really happy when we made sure to account for this drag-and-drop behavior in our application. It wasn’t hard to do, we just never imagined it would be useful!